Free resources

Our guides are designed to inform and support both those taking and instructing on testing

Latest insights

Our blog is where we unpack the science, share what's changing in the world of testing, and answer your questions

Frequently asked questions

Got questions? We've got answers. Our FAQ page is here to help you find quick, clear, and helpful information about our services

Our services

Learn more about our full range of drug, alcohol and DNA testing services

Free resources

Our guides are designed to inform and support both those taking and instructing on testing

CANSFORD LABS

Can a Christmas kiss affect your drug test?

Lolita Tsanaclis

Lolita Tsanaclis

on Dec 19, 2022

At Cansford Labs, we often get asked about the subtleties of drug and alcohol testing. Around Christmas, with festive parties and social gatherings in full swing, questions about exposure and testing outcomes naturally increase. One scenario that often comes up is whether a kiss under the mistletoe could ever result in a positive drug test.

 

Factors affecting detection
Frequency and timing of use

Hair analysis provides insight into longer-term patterns of use, showing whether someone is a heavy or occasional user over weeks or months. In contrast, tests such as oral fluid or urine tests measure more recent use. A one-off exposure from kissing is generally too small to register in hair testing.

Hair growth and biology

Hair grows at an average rate of about one centimetre per month, though individual rates can range from 0.75 to 1.5 centimetres. Each centimetre reflects roughly one month’s history of substance use. Body hair and nails can also be tested, but their detection windows differ from head hair. These variations mean that interpretation must account for individual differences.

Metabolism and physiology

Differences in metabolism, age, gender, and hair type all affect how drugs are absorbed, distributed, and deposited in hair. These individual factors contribute to the complexity of testing outcomes.

Purity and dose of the substance

The form and strength of a substance can influence how long it remains detectable. Higher purity and larger doses are more likely to show up in tests, while minimal exposure, such as through saliva, is unlikely to be sufficient.

Chemical treatments and environmental factors

Hair treatments such as bleaching, dyes, sprays, gels, or other cosmetic products can affect drug detection. Substances that damage the hair’s outer layers may reduce drug levels, though alternative sample sites or nails can still be used to assess exposure.

 

Patterns of use matter

Drug testing is designed to identify meaningful patterns of substance use rather than one-off exposures. Hair analysis, in particular, allows us to build a timeline of use over weeks or months. This provides a more complete picture than a single incident, helping to distinguish between habitual use and negligible exposure.

 

Close contact beyond kissing

While a kiss alone is highly unlikely to cause a positive test, prolonged close contact — such as sharing a bed — could theoretically introduce trace substances through sweat, sebum, or other bodily fluids. Even so, the amounts transferred in this way are usually far below the thresholds that standard drug tests detect, and would rarely influence the outcome.

 

The takeaway

Even in festive situations like a Christmas party or mistletoe moment, kissing someone who has used drugs is extremely unlikely to lead you to receive a positive result. Hair testing identifies patterns of use over time, while other tests detect more recent use. Factors such as hair growth, metabolism, frequency of use, chemical treatments, and substance purity all have a far greater influence than brief intimate contact.

At Cansford Labs, we provide accurate, reliable testing designed to reflect real patterns of use rather than incidental exposure.

 

Lolita Tsanaclis

Lolita Tsanaclis

Dr Lolita Tsanaclis has been at the forefront of drug testing, developing methods for the analysis of drugs in hair since 1993. As co-founder of Cansford Laboratories, she played a key role in bringing hair testing to the UK and shaping the way the industry understands patterns of use. Her work has left a lasting impact on research, practice, and the wider field of drug analysis.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Recent Posts

What are cut-offs and why do they matter?
Spiking awareness: know the signs and know your options
Domestic abuse: The story that never goes away
A judgement on judgments - how law reports have improved over the years
How to prepare someone for a hair strand drug test
5 ways to avoid a hair test: and why they won't work
Reflections on the Jersey Child Law Conference